Quick update.
The past week was fun. We are seeing evidence of the beautiful Northeast fall. We went to the DC Temple over the weekend and saw the organe, red, and yellow colors of fall revealing themselves.


It was spectacular. We also saw a funny cow trailer at the gas station, as you can see in the picture below.

To Sharon's delight we came home to find this sign in our yard. She has been trying to figure out how to get one for the last few weeks.

Midterms are this week. I hope they go well.
As I was reading around today online I found this interesting article called, 'The New Age of Frugality'. It talks about Americans learning how to be frugal again. I had to smile to myself as I was reminded of the many messages I've heard from church leaders about living frugal and within our means. I went to the church website and did a quick search on 'living within your means'. A good list of talks and articles came up with dates like 1981, 1984, 1986, 1987, 1998, 2001, 2002, 2004, 2005, 2008. That is just a small sample. I would like to post the links to a few of these as they were intersting to me.
- First to note was President Ezra Taft Benson's artilce in the June 1987 Ensign. The article was entitled, Pay thy Debt, and live.
- The second one I liked was President Hinkley in a talk in conference published in the Nov ensign. The talk is entitled, 'To the Boys and To the Men' He said, "I repeat, I hope we will never again see such a depression. But I am troubled by the huge consumer installment debt which hangs over the people of the nation, including our own people. In March 1997 that debt totaled $1.2 trillion, which represented a 7 percent increase over the previous year."
- Another ensign artilce I found that references the talk above was in 2002 called, 'Climbing out of Debt'. There was a good section on 'Choose an affordable home'.
- And one in the January Ensign of 2008 less than one year ago, 'Happily living within our Means'. I like how it starts out talking about accountability and being accountable for our actions, especially when it comes to finances.
As I've thought about the mess the world financial system is in, and other 'messes' in which we generally find ourselves, I've found myself relating it to something that is a little graphic, but it might get people's attention. It's like when you pee on the seat. I have become aware that this is a plague that both men and women face. It becomes a serious issue when using public restrooms. Some, nay most people just don't know how to be responsible and clean up after themselves. Too many people just leave it around for the next person to deal with. Clean up after yourself! I learned that when I was potty trained or thereabout. And Sharon claims that no-one is really potty trained at all, until they learn this rule.
In a political economics class I took last year when the dollar first began to fall we discussed what was happening, why it was happening, and what the implications would be. One of the consequences and ways to correct the problem was to do exactly what this article and the prophets, said tighen the belt and live within your means. It seems if anyone is to blame for the situation we're in its all of us.
Follow up on the last post.
I wanted to thank the people who put in a voice on the thoughts of the last post. My intent was not to offend, so if I did I apologize. I don't know why, but I always feel the need to question my own assumptions about the world. I find that doing so I either find my assumption was right, or that I was wrong. I hate to admit that I'm wrong, but I'm human and am usually wrong.
My question is would it really be a 'hand out' or a way to 'entrap the poor in self deflating system that trampled initiative'? From my point of view right now is that people, even those who are wealthy and have health care, are in a real bind when they get sick with something serious, like cancer. You either get really lucky and the 'health insurance' you have works. In which case you would probably still pay a lot of money, or you are disqualified and spend an even larger proportion of money on the cure, or you can't afford it and you die sometimes in a way not very pleasant. What kind of a society thinks it's appropriate to let someone die because they can't afford care? Isn't that putting a price on life?
If all have health care provided and all contribute through tax, is it really a hand out? It seems like people who need care would get it. Having received care they might be healthy enough to contribute to the economy by working and be able to afford to live somewhere, not to mention be able to pay taxes. Maybe that is too ideal. At least people won't have to go into debt to pay for medical procedures or die because of the unfortunate bad luck of getting sick.
There was a good point given about quality of care. Social medicine would lead to a decline in the quality of health care we recienve. To which I would ask those who have lived abroad and experienced a 'social' health care system. Was the quality poor? If it was bad was it because it was a social program or was it due to something else? Was there evidence of corruption and degrading health conditions in the country? Last I checked the US was ranked 37th by the United Nations on the quality of its healthcare. The best healthcare was provided by France.
I think it is tempting for me to look at third world countries and think that the quality of their social health care is bad because it's socialized. But I've been thinking lately that it could be bad because the country is still developing. If some third world countries I have been to had only private health care a lot of people would be suffering more than they are right now and the people might be poorer if they had to seek help from private institutions. I think I'm really going against the grain on this line of thought, but I still feel like there is a lot to be explored, explained, and discussed.